2012

2012

Directed by: Roland Emmerich
Cast: John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Oliver Platt, Thandie Newton, Danny Glover, Woody Harrelson
Running Time: 2 hrs 38 mins
Rating: PG-13
Release Date: November 13, 2009

PLOT: The world is about to end. Turns out the Mayans were right. A select few people are in on the ground work of saving the human race, while others, like Jackson Curtis (Cusack), are trying to desperately save their families from the mass destruction of the entire planet.

WHO’S IT FOR? This film doesn’t even allow you to turn off your brain. Just like 10,000 BC and The Day After Tomorrow there are enough head-scratching moments, if you want to laugh at the film. But If all you live for is special effects, I can’t stop you from seeing this.

EXPECTATIONS: Who doesn’t love John Cusack? Not me. I don’t not love Cusack. Plus, I’m a big fan of Ejiofor and Peet, so I thought as long as … wait a minute, how long is this movie? What the hell?

SCORECARD (0-10)

ACTORS:
John Cusack as Jackson: It’s sad. They spend hours, OK, maybe just hour building up the big destruction of the Earth that we all know is coming. I assume the goal is for us to care for Jackson. But there are no emotions attached to his ex-husband character who’s trying to be a good dad. The only reason we care is because no one wants Lloyd Dobbler to die. He’s better than most in this role, but what they give him to work with simply doesn’t work.
Score: 5

Chiwetel Ejiofor as Adrian: If they didn’t give Cusack enough, they just handed Ejiofor the wrong stuff. Humanity? Moving in on the President’s daughter? Constantly getting his stats of destruction messed up? Yeah, I don’t want to root for this guy. Ejiofor remains one of my favorite bad guys ever in the under-the-radar film Serenity. He’ll move past this role. After all, Jake Gyllenhaal didn’t get hurt my The Day After Tomorrow. Wait, am I being sarcastic?
Score: 3

Oliver Platt as Carl: Villain? I don’t think so. This is my hero. He is logical (and correct) about every single decision he makes. If the Earth is going to crumble, we need men like Carl to be put in charge to make the tough choices.
Score: 6

Rest of Cast: The President has a lisp. Danny Glover has developed a lisp and the first time I heard it was Shooter. I am not alone right? Come on people, join me in my cry! Amanda Peet doesn’t have her usual charm or wit. A big Russian (Zlatko Buric) needs subtitles. Woody Harrelson proves that crazy can be great in films like Zombieland or just a waste like he is hear.
Score: 3

TALKING: Remember how annoying it was when Star Wars introduced midi-chlorian counts? Well, 2012 has neutronics. Even though neutronics feel made up, they are real … but really all the film needed to say was, “a chunk has blown up from the sun, it can’t be stopped, and it will destroy the Earth.” There, that just saved 40 minutes. And count up how many times a serious moment is supposed to take place while on the cell phone, it’s staggering.
Score: 2

SIGHTS: Yes, the special effects are good. But it has the feel of a video game or amusement park ride instead of a movie. I was trying to hit the B button but nothing ever happened. I know some of you just thought that was a compliment. But without the proper story elements, escaping these situations just looks laughable instead of intense.
Score: 6

SOUNDS: The earthquakes rumble like a beast out of Jurassic Park, and the score let’s you know when you are supposed to care, but you really don’t. That’s not the sounds fault.
Score: 5

PLOT SPOILERS

BEST SCENE: Technically, it’s the first time they barely escape in an airplane. That’s right people, we get more than one “oh my god the Earth is falling below them, I don’t think they can possibly make it” plane take-offs.

ENDING: The little girl doesn’t need pull-ups anymore. Well, I guess everything will be all right after all. But wait, 27 days? That’s it? Heck, Wilson the volleyball and I could have made a raft that could have survived that.

QUESTIONS: Really? You want to reference Princess Diana dying and also show Asians being put into relocation camps? Look, if you are going to make us popcorn we are supposed to enjoy, don’t add these things to the mix. And I can’t help but think someone would have explained to the President that he had no choice in the matter and was forced to join the rest of the party.

REWATCHABILITY: No. But if you are going to see it no matter what, choose the theater or a really big TV, cause the disasters are all this film has going for it.

OVERALL

Train wreck. Car wreck. Plane wreck. Boat wreck. Please tell me you’ve picked up on the common theme here people. It’s a wreck. The odds of Jackson Curtis and his family surviving the way that they did is about 0.001 percent. But since they keep surviving, there’s nothing nerve racking about these situations. Yet somehow instead of just watching people try to survive, we are dealt moral dilemmas like survival of the fittest (richest) and what exactly is cruelty. It’s sloppy. To top it off, the running time should have been cut in half. 2012 is a disaster, just not the kind it is hoping for.

FINAL SCORE: 3/10


Box Office Review – Nov. 15 – 2012 crushes A Christmas Carol

2012 interviews with Woody Harrelson, John Cusack, Amanda Peet and Thandie Newton

DVD, Blu-ray and film reviews … Up, Bruno, 2012, Pirate Radio and more

Flicks on 6 – ‘2012,’ ‘Ponyo,’ ‘Where the Wild Things Are’ and a man with a yellow hat

Monthly Movie Preview – November 2009 … A Christmas Carol, 2012, The Twilight Saga: New Moon and more

9 Comments

  1. Becky

    This review was very off-putting. It didn't t really tell me much about the quality of the movie, and rambled on with snipets of what seems extraneous information that is unrelated to the movie. I'm guessing the sarcasm was meant as humor, but wasn't funny.

    I got that you didn't like the movie, but give me valid reasons in an objective critique – not a lot of senseless verbiage. I most definitely will have to see it myself, as this review offered no insights.

    • Carlos

      What can you possibly say about the world folding in on itself in a variety of ways… if the whole movie is a variation on this delusional (and in my opinion perverse and somewhat masturbatory) fantasy, than what can possibly be said? "I didn't like the visual effects" or "there was no story line" ? Its all implied in the film itself. Perhaps the film is its own best critic. Its almost impossible to even critique this film as an "outside" observer since there are no reference points in the film (literally the whole film disorients and confuses not because its a complicated mess but because it is completely void of any content!). The film is so haphazardly put together that there is not link between each of the scenes other than the cliché's that mask over the banality of the violence being depicted. GREAT REVIEW precisely because it makes clear that there is really nothing to say about it.

  2. TODO

    Right, Becky…I most definitely will have to stick my head in a pot of boiling water because when my Mom told me not to when I was a kid, she didn't go beyond explaining it was DANGEROUSLY HOT. Go ahead, RUN to the nearest theater, plunk down your 10 bucks, and murder 2 hours of your life with mind-numbing, idiotic, plotless dreck. Then you'll KNOW it's dreck. Very pro-active of you. YOU are why Hollywood producers keep grinding out stupid eye-candy sausages like this, having zero thought-provoking content. Because……"That's entertainment!"

  3. Matt

    Ok, this comment goes out to all of the 2012 bashers out there. I think you all come across very pompous and full of yourselves. I was in a full theater of varying people, young, old and in between and I deliberately took notice of the people leaving the theater at the end of the movie and I saw no negative reactions and numerous who overwhelmingly enjoyed it. Thats the point isn't it? Were you entertained? Did you enjoy yourself? ABSOLUTELY. And yes I was laughing hysterically while John Cusack and company consistently escaped disaster by inches, but the movie was also able to make me root for them in the end. If your going to go to the trouble of analizing all the minutiae and finding all the contradictions then yes you prabably won't enjoy yourself. But my 11 year old son, his friend, my wife and I all had a blast and so did most in our theater. I guess we're all a bunch of mind numbed simpletons who don't know a bad movie when we see one.

    • Jarrett

      I agree completely. My sister, girlfriend, her sister, and I all thoroughly enjoyed the movie. Of course the good guys keep escaping the seemingly impossible predicaments they were thrust into… Were they supposed to die 45 mins in? I don't think so. Sure there were the cheesy elements such as the heroes who try to save everyone, but it would be pretty boring without the conflict of those guys against the ones who are all for survival of the fittest and what not. It was funny, the FX were pretty darn good in my opinion, and the characters were likable. Overall this movie did what it was supposed to do: ENTERTAIN!

  4. Mehr

    this film was awesome, but thats just my opinion some people thought it was dumb, but in todays cinema what films aren’t? Just look at New Moon and Transformers.

  5. derbar

    yep, the special effects aint worth it. i admit i was thrilled for around 1 minute but the other 157 minutes made me want to get up and leave and forget it ever happened. i wouldn’t recommend this movie to anyone with an IQ over 120.

  6. fariha

    i completely agree with the writer of the review. I hated the movie , i mean seriously , only 5  people struggle to live what bout the rest , i was watching it with my family and it was more hilarious than i had expected .its totally pointless. yes some scenes were nice but they rest were all childish. it  wasn’t exciting at all and every1 could predict that the family would survive. it was more like a video game than a movie.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

Leave a Reply

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes